Legal Opinion
Matter of Application of Anixter
California Supreme Court
Decided January 7, 1914No. Crim. No. 1804PublishedCited by 10 opinions
APPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus directed to the marshal of the town of Winters. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Petitioner was convicted in the recorder’s court of the town of Winters, county of Yolo, state of California, of violating the provisions of a penal ordinance of that town. Section one of the ordinance is as follows:
“It shall be, and is hereby made unlawful for any person, corporation, firm, company, association, or club, as principal, agent, employee, or otherwise, within the corporate limits of the said town of Winters, to solicit orders, take orders, or make agreements for the sale or delivery of any intoxicating liquors or liquor of any kind whatever, or in any quantity or quantities.’’
The…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Delamater v. South DakotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Ex parte ChristensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Matter of EllsworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- McCollum v. McConaughySupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Sandelin v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- People v. SilvaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Herald v. Glendale Lodge No. 1289California Court of Appeal · 1920
- Golden & Co. v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
- Cuthbert v. WoodmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.