Legal Opinion
Cammack v. v. N. Holderman & Sons,Inc.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided October 1, 1973No. 279PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHunsicker, J.
An appeal has been lodged in this court by the defendant, V. N. Holderman and Sons, Inc., from a judgment denying a motion (1) to reconsider a summary judgment, and (2) for a stay of the proceedings pending a’ trial of an appropriation case.
The “petition” was filed against Holderman by Ivan O. Cammaek and Donna B. Cammaek on March 16, 1964. On November 23, 1964, an amended petition was filed, to which an answer was filed on May 21, 1966. After some legal skirmishing, a motion for summary judgment was filed by the Cammacks, appellees herein.
The motion for summary judgment was granted February…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Coffman v. Federal Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Leonard v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
- Wynn v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- Tye v. Hertz Drivurself Stations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
- Davis v. FinchOhio Court of Appeals · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Davison v. RiniOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
- Summit Petroleum, Inc. v. K.S.T. Oil & Gas Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1990
- Bautista v. KolisOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
- Mick v. New HollandOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Urey v. Alside, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1989