Legal Opinion

Cohoon v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 31, 1895PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Adams District Court. — Hon. H. M* Townee, Judge. Action to recover damages for personal injuries,, and for* damages to horses and wagon. Jury trial. Verdict, by order of court, for defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtKinne, J.

I. The petition charges the defendant-with negligence in running its' train, which struck defendant’s wagon and caused the injuries, on the-depot grounds in the city of Villisca, at a greater rate-of speed than eight miles per hour. It is averred that by reason thereof the accident happened, and that, plaintiff did not contribute thereto. It is also claimed, that defendant was guilty of negligence in the speed at-which it ran its train, regardless of the statutory negligence pleaded. The answer was a general denial. The-court, at the close of plaintiff’s testimony, and on defendant’s motion,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Artz v. C., R. I. & P. R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  2. McKonkey v. C., B. & Q. R. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1875
  3. Latty v. B., C. R. & M. R'y. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1874
  4. Johnson v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1888

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hansen v. KemmishSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  2. Kinyon v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  3. Dicaprio v. . N.Y.C.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
  4. Hoffard v. Illinois Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  5. Menut v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API