Ingrassia v. ACW Mfg. Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PEE CURIAM.
There is no diversity óf citizenship, for the appellant is a citizen of New York and the appellee is a New York corporation. This bill sets forth infringement of patents, utility, notice, alleged infringement, threat thereof, and a prayer for damages, It also contains allegations, in a separate cause of action, for unfair competition on alleged copying of the size, stand, and shape of the appellant’s box and pads, the color of the label and advertising text, all of which is stated to be trading upon the good will and good name of the appellant with intent to deceive the public.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Standard Paint Co. v. Trinidad Asphalt Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Geneva Furniture Manufacturing Co. v. S. Karpen & Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- A. Leschen & Sons Rope Co. v. Broderick & Bascom Rope Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
- American Laundry Machinery Co. v. Prosperity Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
- Planten v. GedneyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Levering & Garrigues Co. v. MorrinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- Hanna v. Brictson Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- Frankart, Inc. v. Metal Lamp CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1929
- Recamier, Mfg. Co. v. Harriet Hubbard Ayer, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1932
- Chernow v. Cohn & Rosenberger, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.