Legal Opinion
Snoddy v. Teepak, Inc.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided May 14, 1990No. 1-89-1049PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor
On November 27, 1984, Linda Snoddy et al. (plaintiffs) filed a complaint alleging battery against Teepak, Inc. (Teepak). Subsequently, plaintiffs filed four amended complaints, which added additional plaintiffs and strict liability claims against Stauffer Chemical Company (Stauffer) and PPG Industries (PPG). Plaintiffs alleged that Stauffer and PPG manufactured or supplied one of the chemicals, used in the Teepak factory, that allegedly injured plaintiffs.
In July 1988, plaintiffs and Teepak reached a settlement (the Plaintiff/Teepak Settlement). Teepak agreed to pay $191,000 and waive a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Silver v. SilverSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Ballweg v. City of SpringfieldIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
- Rakowski v. LucenteIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Fabiano v. City of Palos HillsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
- Troyer v. AdamsHawaii Supreme Court · 2003
- McDermott v. Metropolitan Sanitary DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- Lilly v. MARCAL ROPE AND RIGGING INC.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1997
- Alvarez v. Fred Hintze ConstructionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.