Legal Opinion
Studio 010 Inc v. Digital Cashflow LLC
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided May 29, 2024No. 2:20-cv-01018Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 9 AT TACOMA 10 11 STUDIO 010 INC, CASE NO. 2:20-cv-01018-DGE 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART v. AND DENYING IN PART 13 PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DIGITAL CASHFLOW LLC, et al., ATTORNEY FEES (DKT. NO. 119) 14 Defendants. 15 16 I INTRODUCTION 17 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for attorney fees (Dkt. No. 119), to which 18 Defendants did not respond. The Court’s order entering partial default judgment in favor of 19 Plaintiff concluded this case presented “exceptional circumstances” justifying an award of 20…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Moreno v. City of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Gates v. DeukmejianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Julie Chalmers v. City of Los Angeles, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Welch v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.