Legal Opinion

Poss v. Christenberry

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 21, 1959PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYAN, District Judge.

Plaintiff, who does business as “Camerart Studios”, sues for judgment declaring that an order of the Postmaster General issued against him under 39 U.S. C.A. § 259a is null and void and to restrain the New York Postmaster from enforcing such order. Plaintiff now moves for a preliminary injunction restraining the New York Postmaster from “interfering with the mail addressed to and from plaintiff” pending the final determination of the action. Defendant Postmaster cross-moves for summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56, F.R.Civ.P., 28 U.S.C.A., upon the complaint and the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Smith v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Arnstein v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  4. Doehler Metal Furniture Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  5. Sunshine Book Co. v. SummerfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Manual Enterprises, Inc. v. DaySupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Sunshine Publishing Company v. SummerfieldDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1960
  3. Kirby v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. Frank L. Collier v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1960
  5. Big Table, Inc. v. SchroederDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API