Legal Opinion

Ueland v. Dealy

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1903PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Rolette county, D. E. Morgan, J. Action by Andreas Ueland, receiver of the Washington Bank, against Michael Dealy and S. A. Dealy. Judgemnt for plaintiff. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtWallin, C. J.

This action is brought to foreclose a mortgage upon real estate which was given by the defendants to secure their note for $2,000, dated June 22, 1891, and made payable to the firm of Haugen, Johnson & Co., which note was transferred by the payees thereof to the Washington Bank of Minneapolis, which bank, having become insolvent, is now in the hands of Andreas Ueland, this plaintiff, as receiver. The action was tried without a jury, and is now in this court to be tried anew on all the issues.

Certain depositions were taken in behalf of the plaintiff under a stipulation made between counsel as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Newton v. . PorterNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Fitzpatrick v. PapaIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Moore v. BookerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Murray v. PhillipsIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Morrill v. MoultonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1867

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Scott v. Vulcan Iron Works Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Walters v. RockNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Great Western Life Assurance Co. v. ShumwayNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  4. F. A. Patrick & Co. v. NurnbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
  5. O'Leary v. SchoenfeldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API