Legal Opinion

Murray v. Phillips

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1877PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Erom the Kosciusko Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

— In this action the appellee, as plaintiff, sued the appellant, as defendant, in the court below, on a promissory note executed by the appellant to the order of the appellee. . . ,

The appellant answered in five paragraphs, in substance, as follows:

1. A general denial;

2. Set-off;

3. A total want of consideration ;

4. Payment in full before the commencement of the action; and,

5. That, after the maturity of the note in suit, for a valid consideration paid by the appellant to the appellee, *57the appellee agreed to forbear the commencement of suit upon said note until the 1st day of August, 1874.

The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Comer v. HimesIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Ridgeway v. DearingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Snyder v. SnyderIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Coldren v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1824
  5. Lambert v. BlackmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1820

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Fitzpatrick v. PapaIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Abelman v. HaehnelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Woollen v. WishmierIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Byram v. GalbraithIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Forbing v. WeberIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API