Murray v. Phillips
Indiana Supreme Court
Erom the Kosciusko Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.
— In this action the appellee, as plaintiff, sued the appellant, as defendant, in the court below, on a promissory note executed by the appellant to the order of the appellee. . . ,
The appellant answered in five paragraphs, in substance, as follows:
1. A general denial;
2. Set-off;
3. A total want of consideration ;
4. Payment in full before the commencement of the action; and,
5. That, after the maturity of the note in suit, for a valid consideration paid by the appellant to the appellee, *57the appellee agreed to forbear the commencement of suit upon said note until the 1st day of August, 1874.
The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Comer v. HimesIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
- Ridgeway v. DearingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Snyder v. SnyderIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
- Coldren v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1824
- Lambert v. BlackmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1820
3Cited by13 opinions
- Fitzpatrick v. PapaIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Abelman v. HaehnelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
- Woollen v. WishmierIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Byram v. GalbraithIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Forbing v. WeberIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.