Stroud v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BAXTER, J.
Here we consider issues concerning the application of Penal Code section 861. This statute requires dismissal of a criminal complaint if the preliminary examination is not completed in “one session . . . , unless the magistrate, for good cause shown by affidavit, postpones it.” {Ibid., italics added.)1
During a preliminary examination of capital defendants in custody, the parties stipulated to minor interruptions for their convenience and waived, on the record, the continuous conduct of the examination during those particular periods. Then, on the fourth day of the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. MemroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. Pompa-OrtizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- People v. BoldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. StandishCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- People v. SuttonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- People v. HAJJAJCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Laraway v. SUTRO & CO. INC.California Court of Appeal · 2002
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.