Wilson v. City of Central City
Kentucky Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Justice SCOTT.
This case presents the question of whether Kentucky’s Whistleblower Act protects city employees. The Muhlenberg Circuit Court granted summary judgment for the City of Central City, Kentucky (“Central City”), although that court did not address the issue before us. The Court of Appeals affirmed, concluding that cities are not “employers” under the Whis-tleblower Act, and therefore are not subject to it. We granted discretionary review and, because we agree that cities are not “employers” under the Whistleblower Act, we affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
The Central City…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Schwindel v. Meade CountyKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
- Kentucky Center for the Arts Corp. v. BernsKentucky Supreme Court · 1991
- Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government v. SmolcicKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
- Caneyville Volunteer Fire Department v. Green's Motorcycle Salvage, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2009
- Comair, Inc. v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County Airport Corp.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pennyrile Allied Community Services, Inc. v. RogersKentucky Supreme Court · 2015
- Stanford v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2013
- Melvin Kindle v. City of Jeffersontown, KYCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Butrum v. Louisville Metropolitan GovernmentDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2020
- Elaine Hughes v. Norton Healthcare, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.