Legal Opinion

O'Doherty v. Catonsville Plumbing & Heating Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 29, 1971No. [No. 468, September Term, 1970.]PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcWilliams, J.

The O’Dohertys owned a three-story frame house of fin de siécle vintage in the Baltimore suburb of Catonsville. In November 1966 the appellee was summoned to unstop a bathtub drain. After earlier false starts Smith and Lincoln, employees of the appellee, turned up at 8:00 a.m. on Saturday, 26 November, to deal once more with the problem. They gained access to the drain by removing a panel in the wall of an adjoining bedroom, known as “Grandma’s room.” Using a flashlight they could see the tub resting between two heavy (4" x 8") timbers. By getting down on his “hands and knees with * * * [his]…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Proctor Electric Co. v. ZinkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  2. Trusty v. WoodenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  3. Arshack v. Carl M. Freeman Associates Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  4. Vroom v. Arundel Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1971

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. B & K Rentals & Sales Co. v. Universal Leaf Tobacco Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  2. O'Doherty v. Catonsville Plumbing & Heating Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  3. Frantz, Inc. v. WagersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1972
  4. Willis v. CurryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  5. (2003), Maryland Attorney General Reports2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API