Legal Opinion
LABMD, INC. v. TIVERSA HOLDING CORP.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 16, 2019No. 2:15-cv-00092Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LABMD, INC., ) Plaintiff, ) ) VS. ) Civil ‘Action No. 15-92 ) Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly ) TIVERSA HOLDING CORP. formerly ) Re: ECF Nos. 393 and 402 known as TIVERSA, INC.; ROBERT J. ) BOBACK; M. ERIC JOHNSON; DOES _ ) 1-10, ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Presently before the Court is the Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(b)(2) (the “Motion for Sanctions”) filed by Defendant Tiversa Holding Corp. (“Tiversa”). ECF No. 393. In the Motion for Sanctions, Tiversa requests that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lefteri Poulis and Athena Poulis, His Wife v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Tracinda Corp. v. Daimlerchrysler AgCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Bowers v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Elsie A. Digregorio, Administratrix of the Estate of Daniel S. Digregorio, Deceased v. First Rediscount CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
- Janet Martin Klein v. Stahl Gmbh & Co., Maschinefabrik and Heidelberg Usa, Successor-In-Interest to Heidelberg Eastern, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.