Searcy v. Manganhas
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
STATON, Judge.
David Webb Searcy brought a medical malpractice action against Dr. J. P. Mang-anhas and Dr. Donald Vandertoll. At the completion of Searcy’s presentation of evidence, the trial court removed the case from the jury’s consideration by granting the physicians’ joint motion for judgment on the evidence.
On appeal, Searcy raises three issues for our consideration:(1) Did the trial court err in its granting of the motion for judgment on the evidence?(2) Was the trial court’s refusal to admit Searcy’s testimony as to informed consent reversible error?(3) Did the trial court err in its…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Huff v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1977
- Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. v. ChapmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Stockberger v. Meridian Mutual InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Revord Ex Rel. Revord v. RussellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Lovko v. LovkoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. EdgmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Culbertson v. MernitzIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Clouse v. FielderIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Yang v. StaffordIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
- Weinstock v. OttIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.