Legal Opinion

United States v. Charles E. Berling

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided November 22, 1963No. 13900_1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judge.

Charles E. Berling, defendant, has appealed from a judgment of the district court, on a jury verdict finding him guilty of aiding, abetting and counselling in the making and using of false documents, in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 1001 and 10021 *as charged in count II of an indictment.

The jury also found Berling guilty on count I, which charged a conspiracy to make false statements in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 371.2 Berling’s motion for judgment of acquittal as to count I notwithstanding the verdict, was granted.3

*250Defendant now asserts that the district court,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Schaffer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. United States v. Max Schaffer, Norman Schaffer, Benjamin T. Marco and Hyman Karp, Anthony Stracuzza, Mario Stracuzza and Dorothy StracuzzaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  4. United States v. LeviCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
  5. United States v. William W. RabinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stark v. ConnallyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1972
  2. Stark v. ConnallyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1972
  3. United States v. Charles E. BerlingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API