Legal Opinion

Stark v. Connally

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 11, 1972No. 72-1045, 72-1157PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

Before HAMLIN,* Circuit Judge, and EAST and SWEIGERT, District Judges. SWEIGERT, District Judge.

Plaintiffs in No. 72 1045 include several named individuals who are bank *1244customers, also the American Civil Liberties Association, suing on behalf of itself as a bank customer and also on behalf of such of its numerous members as are also bank customers; also a bank —the Security National Bank. The only plaintiff in No. 72 1157 is the California Bankers Association, suing on behalf of its membership, which comprises all California banks.

These plaintiffs seek to enjoin the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Shelton v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. California Bankers Assn. v. ShultzSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. Mitchell Miller, Susan McDuffie Weeks, and John Henry McDuffieCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  3. United States v. KaatzCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
  4. Oman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Roe v. IngrahamDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API