Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Nash

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1933No. 3029PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The fourteenth amendment to the constitution of the United States, and article I, sections 1 and 8, of the constitution of the State of Nevada, both serve to fix the limits which may not be transcended by valid legislation under the guise of police power. 12 C.J. 929, 931, 932; McQuillin Municipal Corporations (2d ed.), vol. II, pp. 713, 716, 717, 718-720, 721-722, 729.

It has been held that competition between vendors of ordinary merchandise may not be eliminated in furtherance of public welfare. New St. Ice Co. v. Liebmann, 285 U.S. 262, 76 L.Ed. 747.

Also, it has been held that it is beyond…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. New State Ice Co. v. LiebmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Rast v. Van Deman & Lewis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Soon Hing v. CrowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Gundling v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  5. Louis K. Liggett Co. v. BaldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Viale v. FoleyNevada Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Oueilhe v. LovellNevada Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State Ex Rel. Roth v. WaterfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API