Tadlock v. . Mizell
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBbogdeN, J.
Does the conveyance, by deed, of “a certain house or tenement” include the land upon .which said house is situate? The identical question was involved in the case of Broadhurst v. Mewborn, 171 N. C., 402. The Court said: “The devise of a ‘house,’ when referring, as in this case, to the dwelling-house of the owner, has been held the equivalent of the word messuage, and, in the absence of some term or clause restrictive of its meaning, it is said to convey the lot on which the dwelling is situate, together with the outbuildings customarily used by the owner as a part of his residence.” To the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Broadhurst v. . MewbornSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Hawkins v. WilsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1865
- State ex rel. Post v. Board of EducationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1912
- Den on Demise of Wise v. WheelerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1845
3Cited by8 opinions
- Seawell v. SeawellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Gault v. . Lake WaccamawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Gault v. Town of Lake WaccamawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Zale Corp. v. E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Dimond v. KellyAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.