Legal Opinion

Gault v. Town of Lake Waccamaw

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 8, 1931PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClakksok, J.

The first contention of the defendant: “Were the streets, squares and commons of the old (unincorporated) town of Flemington dedicated to the use of the public and accepted and used by the public, by virtue of said dedication ?” On the present record, taking all the evidence, we find no facts or law to support this contention. We *599think there is a distinction between land that is in a municipality mapped and platted and deeds made to the lots in which streets, squares and commons are dedicated and accepted by the municipality, and land that is mapped or platted and deeds made to the lots in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Moose v. . CarsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  2. Conrad v. West End Hotel & Land Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  3. Tise v. Whitaker-Harvey Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  4. Hughes v. Clark.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  5. Sexton v. . Elizabeth CitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Steadman v. Town of PinetopsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Roberts v. Town of CameronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. Lancaster v. Maple Street Homeowners Ass'n, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  4. Miller v. FowleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. R. R. v. . DunnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API