Legal Opinion
Brown v. Wilhelm
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 15, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2011-0277PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BERYL A. HOWELL, District Judge.
The Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, is a District of Columbia resident suing former District of Columbia Mayor Adrian Fenty and two officers of the District of Columbia Protective Services, Officer Michael Wilhelm and Commander Louis Cannon, under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 19, 2011, the Court dismissed the complaint against Fenty and Cannon. Order, ECF No. 13; see Brown v. Wilhelm, 819 F.Supp.2d 41 (D.D.C.2011). Pending before the Court is Wilhelm’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Mot.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Messerschmidt v. MillenderSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hargraves v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Williams v. DevlinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015