Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hoffman v. Cohen

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 28, 1974No. 19763Published

1DissentBussey, Justice

(dissenting) :

Being of the view that the issues in this cause were correctly decided below, I most respectfully dissent. Prior to July 7, 1970, the particular area of Myrtle Beach was zoned as “single family residential” by the City of Myrtle Beach. On that date, the city amended its zoning ordinance, over the objection of at least some of the appellants in this proceeding, so as to permit condominiums in the area. It is true that Forest Dunes Subdivision has developed basically, but not exclusively, as a single family residence neighborhood, there having been some violations of the zoning…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. EDWARDS v. SurrattSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
  2. Forest Land Co. v. BLACKSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
  3. Donald E. Baltz, Inc. v. R. v. Chandler & Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1966
  4. McDONALD v. WELBORNSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
  5. Nance v. WaldropSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API