Legal Opinion

Quapaw Tribe of Oklahoma v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided September 12, 2016No. 12-431L, 12-592L, 13-51XPublished

1Opinion of the Court

■ Indian Tribe Claims; Breach of Trust Obligations; Partial Summary Judgment; Law of the Case; Binding Effect of Government-Sponsored Accounting Reports; Establishing Government Duties to Tribes; Congressional Reference; Statute of Limitations in Tribal Claims; Res Judicata.

OPINION AND ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

WHEELER, Judge

This case involves many significant claims against the United States for breaches of .fiduciary duty, among other things. Both parties assert that multiple claims can be resolved through summary judgment. The Qua-paw Tribe relies heavily on the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API