Legal Opinion

Speed v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 18, 1933No. 9387PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.

It is not deemed useful to elaborate any of the *752headnotes except the fifth. The movant complains that the court erred in failing to charge the jury in the language of the Penal Code, § 1020, as follows: "The burden of proof generally lies upon the party asserting or affirming a fact, and to the existence of whose case or defense the proof of such fact is essential. If a negation or negative affirmation be so essential, the proof of such negative lies on the party affirming it.” There was no> request so to charge. The court did instruct the jury: "The defendant enters on the trial of her case…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. O'Dell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Long v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1868
  3. Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Barkley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  2. McDuffie v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  3. Fambrough v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  4. Lee v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API