Legal Opinion

Stokes v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 22, 1980No. [No. 16, September Term, 1980.]PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDigges, J.

In this case we are called upon to apply that venerable principle of Maryland criminal law which prohibits the use of a defendant’s significantly incriminating remark when that statement was extracted from him by promise of favor or threat of punishment.

The facts are not in dispute. At 2:30 a.m. on November 14, 1974, two narcotics officers of the Baltimore City Police Department, armed with a warrant, arrived to conduct a search for controlled dangerous substances at the house where petitioner Bernard Lee Stokes and his wife were living with several other persons. Upon entering the dwelling,…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. United States v. CrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Lynumn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Government of Virgin Islands v. GereauCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Oken v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  2. State v. SugarSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  3. Ball v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  4. People v. StithNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Winder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API