Legal Opinion

Young v. International Union

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided December 1, 2015No. Case No. 15-11151PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING UAW DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS [16] AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ REQUESTS TO AMEND COMPLAINT

Nancy G. Edmunds, United States District Judge

Plaintiffs’ Complaint asserts a classic hybrid section 301 claim, alleging that the defendant employer violated Plaintiffs’ rights under several collective bargaining agreements, associated supplemental agreements and memorandums of under*607standing, and that the defendant unions breached .their duty of fair representation. This matter is before the Court on two of the defendant unions’ motion to dismiss. The court held a hearing on…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Ford Motor Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Chauffeurs, Teamsters & Helpers Local No. 391 v. TerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Simon v. Short (In re Oakland Physicians Med. Ctr., L.L.C.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
  2. Dawson v. United Association of Plumbers and Pipefitters (Local 189)District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
  3. Milican v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
  4. Oltmanns v. International Longshoremen's Association Local 1475 Clerks and Checkers Union, Inc.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 2019
  5. Shortridge v. Centrus Energy Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API