Young v. International Union
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING UAW DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS [16] AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ REQUESTS TO AMEND COMPLAINT
Nancy G. Edmunds, United States District Judge
Plaintiffs’ Complaint asserts a classic hybrid section 301 claim, alleging that the defendant employer violated Plaintiffs’ rights under several collective bargaining agreements, associated supplemental agreements and memorandums of under*607standing, and that the defendant unions breached .their duty of fair representation. This matter is before the Court on two of the defendant unions’ motion to dismiss. The court held a hearing on…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Ford Motor Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Chauffeurs, Teamsters & Helpers Local No. 391 v. TerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Simon v. Short (In re Oakland Physicians Med. Ctr., L.L.C.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
- Dawson v. United Association of Plumbers and Pipefitters (Local 189)District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
- Milican v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
- Oltmanns v. International Longshoremen's Association Local 1475 Clerks and Checkers Union, Inc.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 2019
- Shortridge v. Centrus Energy Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.