Legal Opinion
(PC) De'Armond, Jr. v. White
District Court, E.D. California
Decided December 1, 2022No. 1:19-cv-01695Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL THOMAS DE’ARMOND JR., Case No. 1:19-cv-01695-JLT-HBK (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO GRANT DEFENDANT’S EXHAUSTION- 13 v. BASED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT1 14 J. WHITE, (Doc. No. 42) 15 Defendant. 16 FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD 17 18 19 20 Pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion for summary judgment filed on 21 November 5, 2021. (Doc. No. 42, “MSJ”). Plaintiff did not file any opposition and the time to do 22 so has expired. See docket, see also L.R. 230(l). For the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.