Legal Opinion
Fought v. City of Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 12, 2020No. 3:17-cv-01825Unknown
1Opinion
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOSHUA FOUGHT, et al. : : Plaintiffs, : v. : 3:17-CV-1825 : (JUDGE MARIANI) CITY OF WILKES-BARRE, : PENNSYLVANIA, JOSEPH HOMZA, : and MARCELLA LENDACKY, : : Defendants. : MEMORANDUM OPINION I. INTRODUCTION Here the Court considers Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 41). Plaintiffs’ interactions with Defendant Joseph Homza, a police officer with the Police Department of the City of Wilkes-Barre, including encounters with Defendant Homza’s canine partner, Chase, form the basis of many…
2Cases cited114 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.