Commonwealth v. Rich
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
President Judge Crumlish, Jr.,
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the City of Philadelphia appeal a Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas decision1 which struck down as unconstitutional and preempted Philadelphia’s Obscenity Ordinance (Ordinance)2 and discharged appellees. We reverse and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
*33Preemption
The State Obscenity Act3 (Act) is silent on the issue of preemption, leading us to ascertain the intent of the legislature. If the general tenor of the Act reflects an intent to prohibit local ordinances, we are bound to follow that…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Freedman v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Ludwig v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- M.S. News Co. v. CasadoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- Borough of McAdoo v. Lawn SpecialtiesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Brown v. Pornography Com'n of Lower SouthamptonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
- News Company v. CasadoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983