Legal Opinion

Cato v. Hargrove

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided May 27, 2020No. 4:19-cv-00087Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA SPENCER THOMAS CATO, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 19-CV-0087-GKF-FHM ) SKYLER HARGROVE, ) J.T. SNODDY, ) HEATH BROWNELL, ) ) Defendants.1 ) OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on defendants’ motion to dismiss the amended complaint (Dkt. 23), and plaintiff’s “motion to compel for special report and motions” (Dkt. 25). For the reasons discussed below, the Court denies plaintiff’s motion to compel, grants defendants’ dismissal motion and dismisses the amended complaint. I. Procedural background Plaintiff…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API