Legal Opinion

United States v. Abdul Samad, United States of America v. Babry Hanan

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided February 22, 1985No. 83-5090, 83-5091PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge:

Abdul Samad and Babry Hanan appeal their respective jury convictions for importation of heroin and possession of heroin with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1); 952(a) and 960. 1 Samad contends, first, that there was insufficient evidence to support his convictions, and, second, that the trial court erred in admitting evidence tending to show that he had received welfare benefits illegally. Hanan also challenges the sufficiency of the evidence and argues, as well, that the prosecutor’s reference in jury argument to a matter not in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United States v. Henry Tresvant, IIICourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
  4. United States v. Neal T. Roberts and James Albert RobisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  5. United States v. Bobby StatenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. United States v. RusherCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  2. United States v. LightyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
  3. United States v. Louis ManzellaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  4. United States v. Mohammad Dawood NusratyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. Paul Michael MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API