Van Gilder v. City of Denver
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke
These parties appear here in the same order as in the trial court. They are hereinafter referred to as plaintiff and the city, respectively.
This action was by a surety to recover the amount paid on a forfeited criminal recognizance. In October, 1922, an information was filed in the Denver district court charging certain persons, including Roy Coyne, with criminal conspiracy. As per order Coyne gave his personal recognizance in the sum of $2,000. He absconded, was retaken, and his bond raised to $10,000, conditioned on his appearance September 17, 1923, and “from day to day and term to term…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. FeelyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Virginia · 1813
- State v. JimasWashington Supreme Court · 1932
- Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1915
- Scott v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1918
- Van Gilder v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Piz v. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
- Besl Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. CaroSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- State v. MayerIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
- Western Surety Co. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.