In Re A. and B.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered
2Per curiam
A complaint was filed with the County Ethics Committee charging respondents with violation of *333Canon 6 of the Canons of Professional Ethics in that while serving as municipal attorneys, they also were attorneys for and served conflicting interests of certain land and building developers whose projects were located in the same municipality. The Committee did not make a presentment but at our request filed a report. We issued an order to show cause.
Although the testimony in some respects is not free from doubt, we cannot say that it clearly and convincingly…
3Cited by24 opinions
- City of Little Rock v. CashSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
- Southern Valley Grain Dealers Ass'n v. Board of County CommissionersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Black v. State of Mo.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1980
- In Re LaPinskaIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
- In Re Supreme Court Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics Opinion No. 697Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.