Pedro L. Bueno v. John Hallahan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
Pedro L. Bueno, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition challenging his conviction for eight counts of attempted trafficking in stolen property. He contends that the state trial court violated due process by admitting hearsay evidence, requiring him to elect defenses, and enhancing his sentence on the basis of pri- or convictions. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We review de novo, Norris v. Risley, 878 F.2d 1178, 1180 (9th Cir.1989), and affirm.
First, Bueno contends that the district court erred by denying on the merits…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Mathews v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Talal B. Jammal v. John K. Van De Kamp, Attorney General of the State of California Superior Court of the County of Contra CostaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Robert Lee Norris v. Henry Risley, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- State v. SouleArizona Supreme Court · 1991
3Cited by40 opinions
- Russel William Burket v. Ronald Angelone, Director, Virginia Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- Vega v. ZavarasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Stephen Christian, A/K/A Stephen Cline v. William RhodeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Gary Bradley v. W.A. Duncan, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- State of Arizona v. Maverick Kemp GrayArizona Supreme Court · 2016
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.