Legal Opinion
Vogel v. Rushing
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 13, 1949No. 33377PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHalley, J.
Sam Vogel instituted this suit in the district court of Coal County against Roy L. Rushing to recover the sum of $100, less a credit of $2, alleged to be due upon account. The plaintiff alleged that he was entitled to recover this amount as the assignee of his brother, Snyder Vogel, who is alleged to have advanced and loaned to Roy L. Rushing this sum by check; that defendant agreed to repay such amount within a few days, with 6 per cent interest from December 24, 1943. Copy of assignment from Snyder Vogel to Sam Vogel, with power to sue thereon, was attached to the petition as an exhibit.
The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Oklahoma Producing & Refining Corp. of America v. FreemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- First Nat. Bank of Mounds v. CoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Liberty Nat. Bank of Weatherford v. SemkoffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Petty v. FrankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
3Cited by13 opinions
- Finnell v. SeismicSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Rodgers v. HigginsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Tipton v. BursonArizona Supreme Court · 1951
- Britton v. GroomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- Darnaby v. DavisCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.