Legal Opinion · Dissent

Estate of Darryl Houston Price v. Lori Jean Kosmalski

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 2012No. Docket 143123Published

1DissentCavanagh, J.

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s conclusion that a mortgagee only waives its rights to superior priority under MCL 600.3236 if the mortgagee expressly consents to a receivership or the reordering of priorities. Rather, I would hold that a mortgagee may also waive its superior priority rights if the mortgagee acquiesces to and benefits from the receivership.

In support of its conclusion that a receiver may only obtain superior priority in relation to a mortgagee *234“when the mortgagee has unequivocally waived this statutory right of first priority [under MCL 600.3236],” the majority…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Quality Products and Concepts Co. v. Nagel Precision, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Bloomfield Estates Improvement Ass'n, Inc. v. City of BirminghamMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Bailey v. BaileyMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Cohen v. CohenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Sampeer v. BoschmaMichigan Supreme Court · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API