Estate of Darryl Houston Price v. Lori Jean Kosmalski
Michigan Supreme Court
1DissentCavanagh, J.
I respectfully dissent from the majority’s conclusion that a mortgagee only waives its rights to superior priority under MCL 600.3236 if the mortgagee expressly consents to a receivership or the reordering of priorities. Rather, I would hold that a mortgagee may also waive its superior priority rights if the mortgagee acquiesces to and benefits from the receivership.
In support of its conclusion that a receiver may only obtain superior priority in relation to a mortgagee *234“when the mortgagee has unequivocally waived this statutory right of first priority [under MCL 600.3236],” the majority…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Quality Products and Concepts Co. v. Nagel Precision, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2003
- Bloomfield Estates Improvement Ass'n, Inc. v. City of BirminghamMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
- Bailey v. BaileyMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Cohen v. CohenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- Sampeer v. BoschmaMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.