Legal Opinion

State v. Colvin

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 26, 2001No. C4-00-1365PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge

The district court convicted appellant of first-degree burglary. Appellant argues that (1) intent to violate an order for protection is not an independent crime other than trespass, and therefore cannot satisfy an element of first-degree burglary and (2) that the evidence is insufficient to prove he intended to violate the order for protection in effect against him. We conclude that appellant intended to violate the order for protection and that the intent to violate that order constitutes intent to commit an independent crime other than trespass, an element of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. State v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  3. State v. RaceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  4. State v. AshbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  5. State v. IbarraSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. ColvinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  2. State v. GundersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
  3. State v. HintonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
  4. State v. ColvinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API