Legal Opinion

American Nat. Bank of Pawhuska v. Hashbarger

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 29, 1935No. 23685Published

1Per curiam

The plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, brought suit against the. defendants to recover upon six promissory notes. The defendants pleaded payment and satisfaction. The case was submitted to a jury upon the evidence and instructions of the trial court. The jury returned a general verdict for the defendants. No exceptions were taken to any of the evidence or to the instructions of the court by the plaintiff.

The plaintiff seeks a reversal of the case for the reason that the verdict is not supported by the evidence and is contrary to the evidence. The plaintiff urges that upon a conflict of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Swindler v. SelbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. Gilbert v. WelchelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API