Legal Opinion
Cook v. McNaughton
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided May 14, 1890No. 14,311PublishedCited by 12 opinions
From the Elkhart Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtCoffey, J.
This was a suit in the Elkhart Circuit Court by the appellants against the appellee, upon the following promissory note, viz.:
“$300. Elkhart, Ind., Jan. 17th, 1881.
“ I promise to pay to the treasurer of the Cincinnati, Wabash and Michigan Railway Company, or order, three hundred dollars, value received, without relief from valuation or appraisement laws, with interest after maturity at 8 per cent, until paid, and attorney fees.
“ This note is given in consideration of the construction by said railway company of an extension of its railway from Goshen, Indiana, to connect with the Chicago and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railroad v. SpencerIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Conner v. Citizens Street Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Buchanan v. MilliganIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Kealing v. VansickleIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. BalchIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bowlus v. Phenix InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Wabash Railroad v. RayIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
- Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. GramesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
- Shipps v. AtkinsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
- Fisher v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1897
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.