Legal Opinion

In re Acquiring Title to Atlantic Avenue

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1926Published

1Opinion of the CourtHagarty, J.

The proceeding extended over a period of many years and a great deal of testimony was taken. The delay in deciding this motion is due in part to the fact that the record submitted was not complete. Many of the pages of the testimony were missing but have since been supplied.

Damage parcels 1-A, 2 and 3 are parts of a strip of land along the the south side of What Was the objector’s fee at the institution of the proceeding. At that time, there was a railroad switch running diagonally over parts of 2 and 3 to a factory on the fee land, affording a direct railroad shipping connection. The awards…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Cohoes v. President of the Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Matter of City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  3. In Re City of New York Relative to Acquiring Title to Lands Required for the Opening of Avenue " D "New York Court of Appeals · 1910
  4. Ranscht v. WrightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  5. Ranscht v. . WrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API