Legal Opinion

Rouse v. Jennings

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1933No. Docket No. 23, Calendar No. 36,843PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

We take the following statement of facts from defendants ’ brief:

“Plaintiff was licensed under Act No. 317, Pub. Acts 1921, as amended (3 Comp. Laws 1929, § 12198 et seq.), to make loans of $300 or less and charge interest thereon at three and one-half per cent, per month. On November 15, 1929, he loaned defendants $300 at three and one-half per cent, per month secured by a chattel mortgage. On April 4, 1931, there was due on the note $300 for principal and $125 for interest. On that date he loaned defendants $60 more and took two notes, one for $300, with interest at three and one-half per…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gay v. BerkeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Hoyle v. PageMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Lowe v. SchuylerMichigan Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Household Finance Corp. v. GoldringAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  2. Madison Personal Loan, Inc. v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  3. Commonwealth v. State Loan Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API