State v. Muniz
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FLORES, Judge.
Defendant appeals the revocation of his probation. He contends that his probationary term had expired before the proceedings to revoke his probation were initiated. We agree and reverse.
Defendant was sentenced pursuant to a guilty plea to a sentence of incarceration, of which all but one year was suspended. Following the one year incarceration, Defendant was placed on probation for two years “to run CONSECUTIVE to Two year parole period.”
Defendant was released to parole status on February 25, 1991. In September 1992, Defendant’s parole was revoked. In October 1992, the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. Jonathan M.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. DominguezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
- State v. CharltonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
- Brock v. SullivanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. GutierrezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. DuquetteNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
- Garcia v. DorseyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. TriggsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012