Legal Opinion

Youngstown & Suburban Ry Co. v. Prigosin

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 30, 1935No. 2227PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By NICHOLS, J.

In the brief and oral argument for plaintiff in error no claim is made of error in the introduction of evidence by the plaintiff below, and no further claim of error is made as to the exclusion of evidence offered on behalf of the defendant below, except in the matter of the court’s refusal to permit the introduction of evidence as to the fact that The Youngstown and Suburban Railway Company operates its interurban electric railway on its own private right of way where the same crosses East Florida Avenue in the City of Youngstown, and in excluding evidence that said…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lynch, Admx. v. Penna. Rd. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1934

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Grove v. City Railway Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1945
  2. Spitler v. MorrowOhio Court of Appeals · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API