Youngstown & Suburban Ry Co. v. Prigosin
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By NICHOLS, J.
In the brief and oral argument for plaintiff in error no claim is made of error in the introduction of evidence by the plaintiff below, and no further claim of error is made as to the exclusion of evidence offered on behalf of the defendant below, except in the matter of the court’s refusal to permit the introduction of evidence as to the fact that The Youngstown and Suburban Railway Company operates its interurban electric railway on its own private right of way where the same crosses East Florida Avenue in the City of Youngstown, and in excluding evidence that said…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lynch, Admx. v. Penna. Rd. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1934
3Cited by2 opinions
- Grove v. City Railway Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1945
- Spitler v. MorrowOhio Court of Appeals · 1955