Legal Opinion

Troupiansky v. Henry Disston & Sons, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 9, 1957No. Civ. A. 20242PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

■VAN DUSEN, District Judge.

This matter comes before the court on the motion of defendant Henry-Dis-ston & Sons, Inc. (hereinafter called “Disston”) to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint, and on the motion of defendant H. K. Porter Company, Inc. (hereinafter called “Porter”) to dismiss the action or for summary judgment.

Plaintiffs are the record holders of shares of common stock of defendant Disston and bring suit for the fair value of their stock as of November 14, 1955, the day prior to the special meeting of shareholders of Disston at which an “Agreement and Plan-of Reorganization” dated October…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lauman v. Lebanon Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1858
  2. Davidson, Exrx. v. BrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Marks v. Autocar CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1954
  4. Moffett EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  5. Gulbenkian v. GulbenkianDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Turner v. Bituminous Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Stanley Knapp, Jr. v. North American Rockwell Corporation v. Mrs. Smith's Pie Company, Third-Party-DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
  3. Farris v. Glen Alden Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Miller v. SteinbachDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
  5. Rath v. Rath Packing CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API