In re the Judicial Settlement of Fifth Account of Bannin
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by Michael E. Bannin and .another, individually and as trustees, etc., and others, from parts of a decree of tlie Surrogate’s Court of. the county of New York, entered in said Surrogate’s Court on the 20th day of April, 1910, upon the- judicial accounting of the testamentary trustees.
1Opinion of the Court
Clarke, J.:
For many years prior to January 2, 1899, Thomas H. Cullen had been a member of a firm conducting a dry goods commission business under the name of Converse, Stanton & Cullen. On account of continued ill-health Mr. Cullen withdrew from active business, and on said day articles of copartnership were entered into between Edmund W. Converse, Andrew B. Cobb, both of Newton, Mass., Thomas H. Cullen, Eva C. Stanton and Michael E. Bannin, of New York, Frederick S.. Converse; of Brookline, Mass., Margaret 0. Allen, of said Newton, and Charlotte C. Pierce, of Philadelphiá. The said articles…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bowditch v. . AyraultNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- In Re the Final Judicial Settlement of the Annual Accounts of HoytNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- In re of the Accounts of EltingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hodgman v. CobbAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- In re the Estate of AlexanderNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
- In re Marine Midland BankNew York Surrogate's Court · 1974
- In re the Intermediate Judicial Settlement of the Account of KeaneNew York Surrogate's Court · 1916
- In re GlaserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.