Legal Opinion
Robert Goguen v. Jon Haddow
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided July 18, 2019No. Docket: Cum-18-432PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSaufley, C.J.
*334 [¶1] Robert Goguen appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Mills, J. ) dismissing, for failure to state a claim, his complaint alleging professional malpractice and related causes of action arising from Jon Haddow's legal representation of him in federal criminal proceedings. We affirm the judgment.
[¶2] The federal proceedings at issue here began in January 2011 when Goguen was indicted in the United States District Court for the District of Maine for knowingly failing to register as a sex offender. See 18 U.S.C.S. § 2250 (a) (LEXIS through Pub. L. No. 116-19 ).…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Peeler v. Hughes & LuceTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Stevens v. BisphamOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Wiley v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Shaw v. State, Department of AdministrationAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
- Mahoney v. Shaheen, Cappiello, Stein & Gordon, P.A.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- CAIN v. TZOVARRASDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2020
- Robert Goguen v. Jon HaddowSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019