Legal Opinion

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Benjes

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided February 5, 1993No. Civ. A. 91-2340-JWLPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

LUNGSTRUM, District Judge.

I. Introduction.

This matter is currently before the court on plaintiff FDIC’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 76). Plaintiffs motion is directed at certain affirmative defenses, including statute of limitations and comparative causation or fault, which defendant pleaded in his answer. Oral argument on plaintiffs summary judgment motion was held before the court on January 25, 1993. At the oral argument, and through responsive pleadings, the parties more specifically defined the issues pertinent to plaintiffs summary judgment motion. Those…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brown v. KeillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  2. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. IshamDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1992
  3. Federal Sav. and Loan Ins. Corp. v. BurdetteDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1989
  4. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. HudsonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1987
  5. Comeau v. RuppDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Resolution Trust Corp. v. FleischerDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1993
  2. In Re Sunrise Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Resolution Trust Corp. v. GregorDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1994
  4. Resolution Trust Corp. v. FleischerDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1993
  5. Federal Deposit Insurance v. CollinsDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API