Legal Opinion

Sandy City v. Thorsness

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided August 18, 1989No. 880637-CAPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant was convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol. He appeals after entering a conditional no contest plea to the offense. His plea was conditional in order to preserve this appeal challenging the denial of his pretrial motion to suppress all evidence because of an illegal traffic stop. See State v. Sery, 758 P.2d 935, 939 (Utah App.1988).

On appeal, defendant argues that he was stopped without any reasonable suspicion by the officer who followed him. Therefore, defendant claims, his stop was illegal and the subsequent evidence resulting in his conviction should have been…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. SeryCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
  2. State v. SierraCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
  3. State v. HolmesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  4. State v. BairdCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
  5. State v. ChancellorUtah Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. CaseCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
  2. State v. RothCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1992
  3. State v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API