Bale v. Brudevig
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Nttessle, Chief Justice.
This action was brought against the defendants, Selmer Brudevig, Oscar Brudevig, and Elmer Lykken, to recover damages for breach of contract.
The plaintiff and the defendant, Selmer Brudevig, were farmers. In 1948, plaintiff raised 12 acres of potatoes, and Selmer Brudevig 40. acres. Selmer had no potato equipment, but contracted with the defendant, Lykken,.who had a digger and other machinery, to care for and dig his crop. The potatoes ripened. Lykken was about to begin digging Selmer’s potatoes. Pickers were scarce. It was late in the season. There was danger of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. HeatonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
- Crow v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Chung v. Louie Fong Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924
- Pulliam v. MillerNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
- Long's Ex'rs v. BischoffCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Beck v. LindNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
- Trautman v. New Rockford-Fessenden Co-Op Transport Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
- Beck v. LindNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975