Legal Opinion
Hainey v. Parrott
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided September 20, 2007No. 1:02-CV-733PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER APPROVING CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
SANDRA S. BECKWITH, Chief United States District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the parties’ joint motion to approve class action settlement (Doc. No. 50). For the reasons that follow, the parties’ motion to approve the class action settlement is well-taken and is GRANTED.
I. Procedural History
In October 2002, Kathy Hainey and four other named plaintiffs filed this lawsuit on behalf of themselves and a potential class of similarly-situated persons against Dr. Carl Parrott, then the Hamilton County Coroner, and the Hamilton County Board of County…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Denney v. Deutsche Bank AGCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Williams v. VukovichCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Gary Arnett v. Gary T. Myers, Executive Director of the Tennessee Wildlife Resources AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Everett Hadix, C. Pepper Moore v. Perry JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Granada Investments, Inc. v. DWG Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Lonardo v. Travelers Indemnity Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010
- Granato v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Aaron Hall, et al. v. Trivest Partners, L.P., et al.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2026
- Amos v. PPG Industries IncDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019
- Benalcazar v. Genoa Township, OhioDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.