Legal Opinion
Everett Hadix, C. Pepper Moore v. Perry Johnson
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 10, 2003No. 01-2247PublishedCited by 123 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
The inmate plaintiff C. Pepper Moore filed a motion for costs and an incentive award for his role as a class representative in the continuing Hadix litigation, a civil rights action brought by Michigan prisoners alleging unconstitutional conditions of confinement that was settled by consent decree. The district court judge denied Moore’s motion for an incentive award and for costs. We AFFIRM that decision.
I. BACKGROUND
The present appeal focuses on a very narrow issue within the broader Hadix litigation. The Hadix litigation began in 1980, when a group of male…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Boeing Co. v. Van GemertSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- In Re Mego Financial Corporation Securities Litigation Christopher Dunleavy A. Peyser v. Michael Nadler v. Robert Nederlander Jerome J. Cohen Herbert B. Hirsch Wilbur L. Ross, Jr. Deloitte & ToucheCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Shirley K. Rogers v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Richard Vogel v. The City of Cincinnati, the Sentinel Police Association, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- Buchanan v. Stanships, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by123 opinions
- Shane Group, Inc. v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Mich.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Heyne v. Metropolitan Nashville Public SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Daniel Greenberg v. Procter & Gamble CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Gregory Berry v. LexisNexis Risk and InformationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
- Lonardo v. Travelers Indemnity Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010
118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.